News Bulletin
Europe: Limiting Provisions for Divisional Applications
January 15th, 2010The European Patent Office (EPO) will be implementing several changes to the European patent rules in April 2010. Arguably the most onerous change relates to the filing of divisional applications. The rules are rather convoluted, but the primary consideration for applicants is that divisional strategies should be evaluated as early as possible in the prosecution of a European application, and at least at the time of receipt of a first examination report.
From 1 April 2010, a divisional application can only be filed within 24 months of issuance of a first examination report in respect of a pending parent application. This applies to reports only from the Examining Division – reports from the Search Division do not start the 24 month period. If the parent application is itself a divisional application, the 24 month period starts at issuance of the first examination report in respect of the grandparent application (the earliest application in a series), and so on for a series of applications.
Separately, an unrelated 24 month time period is provided to file a divisional application in response to a non-unity objection. The time period commences from the date of issuance of the examination report in which the non-unity objection is raised for the first time. However, a non-unity objection raised in an Extended European Search Report does not set the 24-month time period – the date of issuance of the corresponding examination report will be the relevant date.
Neither of the above time limits is extendable.
Please contact an attorney at Fisher Adams Kelly for more information or advice if you have existing applications in Europe, or intend to file an application in Europe, which may be subject to the new provisions.
Author: Clarissa Wynne
Contact: +61 7 3229 2655 cwynne@fak.com.au
What is the Value of a Patent?
December 9th, 2009What is the value of a patent? There are various financial models available, the most popular of which is discounted cash flow, but do they evaluate the patent or merely provide a somewhat arbitrary dollar value? Does the focus on a dollar value distract us from a wider evaluation of the benefits associated with a patent, or indeed any other form of intellectual property? The focus on dollar value presupposes a buy/sell transaction as the primary medium for value exchange but is this relevant today when we see a diverse range of IP transactions that are outside the traditional buy/sell model. (more…)
What is an IP audit?
November 11th, 2009An intellectual property audit can be considered a number of things. The first thing is that it is a snapshot of the position of a person’s intellectual property. The second thing is that it can also be considered a directional sign to future intellectual property rights and research and development.
The process usually involves three stages. The first stage is an educational process, to alert the subject, and his or her employees to the reasons for the audit and the nature of the process. The second stage is the actual audit process. The third and final stage is the development of a written report, its delivery and subsequent debriefing meeting with the subject organisation.
(more…)
Chemistry News – Looking in the Mirror
November 9th, 2009A chemist shown the structure of a new molecule having a single chiral centre will understand that two enantiomers, being mirror images of one another, may exist. If the molecule exhibits activity a question arises whether that activity is mostly due to only one of the enantiomers and, if so, which one? If the racemate demonstrates strong therapeutic activity there may be pressure to file a patent application quickly to establish rights before competitors identify the same molecule independently or the information is made public. (more…)